Gigabyte M27Q P vs Asus ProArt PA279CRV: Is the Asus ProArt PA279CRV Worth £130 More?
Gigabyte M27Q P or Asus ProArt PA279CRV? We compare price, measured performance and real-world trade-offs to work out which is the better buy.
Tech Daily Review Desk
The short answer
Gigabyte M27Q P at 1ms MPRT against Asus ProArt PA279CRV at 1.8 out of the box. Where they part company is who they suit: the Gigabyte M27Q P is the one to get if you are a dual-purpose work and gaming desk on a budget, the Asus ProArt PA279CRV if you are print work, where Adobe RGB coverage actually matters.
Price difference: The Gigabyte M27Q P undercuts the Asus ProArt PA279CRV by £130. That gap only matters if the extras below are ones you will actually use.
Specifications side by side
| Specification | Gigabyte M27Q P | Asus ProArt PA279CRV |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £299 | £429 |
| Our score | 4 / 5 | 4 / 5 |
| Panel | 27in IPS, 2560x1440 | 27in IPS, 3840x2160 |
| Refresh | 165Hz | 60Hz |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 350 nits |
| Contrast | 1000:1 | 1000:1 |
| Ports | USB-C 65W, 2x HDMI 2.0, DP | USB-C 96W, 2x HDMI 2.0, DP |
| Coverage | 92% DCI-P3 | 99% Adobe RGB, 99% sRGB |
| Response | 1ms MPRT | — |
| Delta E | — | 1.8 out of the box |
How we tested
Every figure quoted above comes from the same protocol, run on every unit in this category. This one spent two weeks as the reviewer’s primary display, driven by both a laptop and a desktop. A calibrated X-Rite i1Display Pro, measurements taken after a thirty-minute warm-up in a room held at 120 lux.
| What we measure | How |
|---|---|
| Colour accuracy | Delta E across 24 ColorChecker patches, out of the box with no calibration, because that is how most panels are used. |
| Brightness uniformity | Nine-point grid, reported as the worst deviation from centre rather than the average. |
| Contrast | Full-screen black and white measured in a darkened room, with local dimming disabled. |
| Power delivery | A 16in laptop under sustained load, checking whether the panel holds charge or loses ground. |
| Text rendering | Subpixel inspection at 200% magnification, which is where OLED fringing shows. |
We deliberately do not report quoted contrast ratios that rely on local dimming, and any HDR400 badge.
The honest caveat: Panel lottery is real. Backlight bleed on our unit may not match yours.
Where the Gigabyte M27Q P wins
- 165Hz and USB-C charging under £300, which nothing else manages
- The KVM switch genuinely works between two machines
- 400 nits is brighter than most at this price
It also has the edge on the intangibles: the KVM saved us swapping a keyboard and mouse for two weeks.
Where the Asus ProArt PA279CRV wins
- 99% Adobe RGB at this price is unmatched
- 96W is enough for almost any laptop
- A genuinely full ergonomic stand including pivot
And in day-to-day use, it is the cheapest panel we have measured above 95% Adobe RGB.
The trade-offs
Neither is flawless. The Gigabyte M27Q P has one clear weak point — the stand only tilts — and the Asus ProArt PA279CRV has its own: 60Hz. Weigh those against how you actually work rather than against the spec sheet.
The value case
Both scored 4 out of 5, and the Gigabyte M27Q P costs £130 less. Unless 99% Adobe RGB at this price is unmatched is specifically what you need, the cheaper one is the better buy and we would not agonise over it.
If neither quite fits
Look at the Dell UltraSharp U2724DE at £549 — it scored 5 out of 5 and suits anyone working from a laptop who wants one cable on the desk. If the budget will not stretch, the AOC 24G2SPU at £149 is the cheapest option in this category we would still put our name to.
Living with each of them
On paper the gap looks like a specification difference; in use it is a habits difference. With the Gigabyte M27Q P the thing you adjust to is the stand only tilts, and you do adjust — within a week it stops registering. Its panel (27in IPS, 2560x1440) is the part you stop thinking about. The Asus ProArt PA279CRV asks for a different accommodation: 60Hz, against a panel of 27in IPS, 3840x2160 that holds up better than the number suggests. Neither compromise is severe. They are simply different, and which one you would rather not think about is a more useful question than which is objectively smaller.
Which one ages better
Both launched in 2023, so neither starts with a support-window advantage. The other half of ageing is the weak point you already know about: the stand only tilts on one side, 60Hz on the other. Weaknesses of that kind do not improve with firmware, so assume you are buying them for the life of the device and price the decision accordingly.
Our recommendation
For most people we would take the Gigabyte M27Q P, which scored 4 out of 5 in our testing against 4 for the other. That said, a score is a summary, not a substitute for knowing what you need.
Buy the Gigabyte M27Q P for 165Hz and USB-C charging under £300, which nothing else manages. Buy the Asus ProArt PA279CRV for 99% Adobe RGB at this price is unmatched.
Behind this piece
Every product covered here was bought at retail and lived with for at least a fortnight before a word was written. Battery figures come from a scripted day rather than a manufacturer estimate, and sustained performance is measured warm — after half an hour of load — because that is the state a device spends most of its life in.
Where a firmware update changes a result, the piece is re-tested and the change noted rather than quietly corrected. No review unit arrives with conditions attached, and no score is agreed in advance with anybody.
Where to go next
If you are weighing this against the rest of the monitors we have covered, the category archive lists every review in date order. The closest comparisons we have published are Gigabyte M27Q P: Colours Look Wrong After Connecting a New Machine and Gigabyte M27Q P: Flickering or Black Frames at High Refresh Rates.
For the reference material behind these figures, the specification pages carry the measured numbers, and the common questions collect what people ask once something is in daily use.
