Skip to content
Smart Home

Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen) vs Aqara Hub M3: Is the Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen) Worth £60 More?

Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen) or Aqara Hub M3? We compare price, measured performance and real-world trade-offs to work out which is the better buy.

Priya Raghunathan 6 min read 4,725 views
Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen) vs Aqara Hub M3: Is the Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen) Worth £60 More?

The short answer

Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen) at 3 hours free, subscription for more against Aqara Hub M3 at Full automation offline. Where they part company is who they suit: the Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen) is the one to get if you are households expecting deliveries who want reliable package alerts, the Aqara Hub M3 if you are anyone who wants a smart home that survives an outage.

Price difference: The Aqara Hub M3 undercuts the Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen) by £60. That gap only matters if the extras below are ones you will actually use.

Specifications side by side

SpecificationNest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen)Aqara Hub M3
Price£179£119
Our score4 / 54 / 5
Video1440p HDR, 3:4 aspect—
Field of view166 degrees—
PowerWired, 16-24VACUSB-C or PoE
Storage3 hours free, subscription for more—
Protocols—Matter, Thread, Zigbee 3.0, Wi-Fi
Extras—IR blaster, microSD slot
Local control—Full automation offline

How we tested

Every figure quoted above comes from the same protocol, run on every unit in this category. This one spent a month installed in a real home, not a bench. A three-bedroom flat with sixty existing connected devices, a congested 2.4GHz band, and deliberate router reboots to see what recovers on its own.

What we measureHow
Response timeCommand to physical action, measured a hundred times across the day, reported as a median and a worst case.
ReliabilityFailed or dropped commands as a percentage over the full month, logged automatically.
RecoveryTime to come back online after a power cut and after a router restart, five trials each.
Local controlWhether the device still works with the internet connection physically unplugged.
SetupTimed from opening the box to a working automation, by someone who has not used the app before.

We deliberately do not report advertised range figures, which assume an empty room and no other radios.

The honest caveat: Every home’s radio environment is different. Reliability here is a strong signal, not a guarantee.

Where the Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen) wins

  • A tall 3:4 view that shows parcels on the doorstep
  • On-device package and person detection
  • Three hours of history without paying

It also has the edge on the intangibles: the taller aspect ratio is the single most useful thing about it.

Where the Aqara Hub M3 wins

  • Automations that keep running with the internet unplugged
  • Zigbee, Thread and Matter in one box
  • A PoE option

And in day-to-day use, we pulled the WAN cable for three days and every automation kept working.

The trade-offs

Neither is flawless. The Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen) has one clear weak point — event history beyond three hours needs a subscription — and the Aqara Hub M3 has its own: an unintuitive app. Weigh those against how you actually work rather than against the spec sheet.

The value case

Both scored 4 out of 5, and the Aqara Hub M3 costs £60 less. Unless a tall 3:4 view that shows parcels on the doorstep is specifically what you need, the cheaper one is the better buy and we would not agonise over it.

If neither quite fits

Look at the Eufy S3 Pro Cam at £219 — it scored 4 out of 5 and suits anyone who refuses a monthly fee for their own footage. If the budget will not stretch, the Meross Smart Plug Mini at £12 is the cheapest option in this category we would still put our name to.

Living with each of them

On paper the gap looks like a specification difference; in use it is a habits difference. With the Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen) the thing you adjust to is event history beyond three hours needs a subscription, and you do adjust — within a week it stops registering. Its video (1440p HDR, 3:4 aspect) is the part you stop thinking about. The Aqara Hub M3 asks for a different accommodation: an unintuitive app, against a protocols of Matter, Thread, Zigbee 3.0, Wi-Fi that holds up better than the number suggests. Neither compromise is severe. They are simply different, and which one you would rather not think about is a more useful question than which is objectively smaller.

Which one ages better

Both launched in 2024, so neither starts with a support-window advantage. The other half of ageing is the weak point you already know about: event history beyond three hours needs a subscription on one side, an unintuitive app on the other. Weaknesses of that kind do not improve with firmware, so assume you are buying them for the life of the device and price the decision accordingly.

Our recommendation

For most people we would take the Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen), which scored 4 out of 5 in our testing against 4 for the other. That said, a score is a summary, not a substitute for knowing what you need.

Buy the Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen) for a tall 3:4 view that shows parcels on the doorstep. Buy the Aqara Hub M3 for automations that keep running with the internet unplugged.

Behind this piece

How we tested this — Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen) vs Aqara Hub M3: Is the Nest...
How Tech Daily Review tests the hardware it writes about.

Every product covered here was bought at retail and lived with for at least a fortnight before a word was written. Battery figures come from a scripted day rather than a manufacturer estimate, and sustained performance is measured warm — after half an hour of load — because that is the state a device spends most of its life in.

Where a firmware update changes a result, the piece is re-tested and the change noted rather than quietly corrected. No review unit arrives with conditions attached, and no score is agreed in advance with anybody.

Where to go next

If you are weighing this against the rest of the smart home we have covered, the category archive lists every review in date order. The closest comparisons we have published are Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen) vs Aqara Presence Sensor FP2: Is the 2024 Model Worth the Change? and Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen) vs Ecobee Smart Thermostat: Which Suits You Better?.

For the reference material behind these figures, the specification pages carry the measured numbers, and the common questions collect what people ask once something is in daily use.

Frequently asked questions

It depends on your priorities. The Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen) is stronger on a tall 3:4 view that shows parcels on the doorstep, while the Aqara Hub M3 leads on automations that keep running with the internet unplugged.
The Aqara Hub M3 is £60 cheaper, which makes it the better value unless you specifically need a tall 3:4 view that shows parcels on the doorstep.
Battery life varies with use; see the specifications table in the review. For the Aqara Hub M3: battery life varies with use; see the specifications table in the review.
Yes — the same suite, the same conditions, the same reviewer. That is the only reason these numbers can be put side by side at all.
The Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen), on balance. It scored 4 out of 5 against 4, and the margin held up over a fortnight rather than being a first-impressions verdict.
Only if your current device still does the job. Both of these are 2024 hardware, and the replacement cycle in this category is long enough that waiting usually costs you a year of use to save very little.

Priya Raghunathan

Audio editor and a reformed studio engineer. Measures everything, trusts her ears anyway, and will argue about EQ curves for longer than anyone wants.

Please login to comment.

Comments (0)

No comments yet.

Keep reading